Index Breishis Shemos Vayikra Bamidbar Dvarim Return to Eflip

Mattos - Emptiness

"If a man takes a vow to Hashem or sears an oath to establish a prohibition upon himself, he shall not descecrate (yachel) his word;  according to whatever comes from his mouth shall he do.”   Numbers 30:3

Two of the places where the word 'chillul' occurs in hallachah is in relation to Hashem and Shabbos.  We say that a person who desecrates the name of God is guilty of 'chillul Hashem', and that a person who desecrates Shabbos is guilty of 'chillul Shabbos'.  The word 'chillul' is usually translated as 'desecration'.  Let us further examine what the  concept means, and why it is used in relation to these cardinal sins.

The word 'challul' literally means empty or hollow.  The Hebrew word 'challil' refers to a flute because it is a hollow musical instrument.  How does the concept of hollowness and emptiness apply to the Almighty and Shabbos?  Since God is omnipresent, being everywhere, how can someone's act affect His pervasive presence?  Likewise, once Shabbos begins on Friday evening, it is there until the next evening.  How do we relate the concept of emptiness and hollowness to the presence of Shabbos, and how might our actions be involved?

By way of analogy, physics tells us that heat exists everywhere in the universe.  Heat is a measure of the movement of atoms.  The faster they move and collide with each other, the greater the heat.  Heat is reduced when atoms slow down and collide less frequently..  Since atoms exist everywhere in the universe, in greater or lesser density, moving around faster or slower, heat exists everywhere in varying degrees.   On the surface of the sun the atoms have tremendous energy and are moving and colliding very fast, and so it is hotter than in the North Pole where the atoms are much more sluggish.  Heat is everywhere, but its presence or preponderance varies from place to place.

Even though we say that Hashem is everywhere, perhaps the analogy applies to Hashem as well, and He can have a greater or lesser 'presence' in different places. Perhaps Hashem's presence is more 'palpable' at the Kosel that in a den of idol worshippers, though He is present in both places. Likewise, the spirit of Shabbos obviously exists throughout Shabbos, but perhaps there is a greater or lesser density of 'shabbos-ness' in the air in different places and at different times. 

The concept of 'chillul Hashem' or 'chillul Shabbos' therefore confronts us with the startling idea that perhaps people's actions can affect the presence and 'density' of Hashem and Shabbos in the world.  If we act in a proper and holy way, we draw towards our locale a greater presence and 'density' of Hashem and Shabbos, to the extent that this greater presence can actually be felt and experienced.  In a holy community, where everyone is upright and acts in a G-dly manner, the feeling of Hashem's presence would be much greater and more palpable.  In the same way, in a place where the spirit of Shabbos is punctilliously observed, one can feel surrounded by a greater sense of Shabbos.

On the other hand, if people, God forbid, do acts that fall under the category of chillul Hashem, the presence of Hashem is lesssened in that place, and that place is 'emptied' and 'hollowed' of the Hashem's presence.  If people are guilty of chillul Shabbos, the presence of Shabbos becomes less present, and one would feel less of the spirit of Shabbos in the air.

An act of chilllul Hashem has two very important consequences.  First, the lesser 'density' of Hashem's presence in a place makes it easier for sin and evil to infiltrate.  Hashem's presence can serve as a deterrance to sin.  The more 'dense' Hashem's presence is, the less 'room' there is for bad acts, bad thoughts, and bad people to find a foothold.  But when acts of chillul Hashem lessen Hashem's presence, people find less resistance externallly and internally to do bad things and to have bad thoughts.  This can become a slippery slope, with more sin reducing Hashem's presence, in turn making it more conducive for more sin to occur.  It is obviously better when things move in the opposite direction, when more good acts leads to a greater 'density' of Hashem's presence,  and this can inspires us to be even better. 

A second consequence is that when Hashem's presence is less, He is less 'there' to help us when we call on Him in times of trouble and need.  If His presence has been steadily increased over time by a holy community trying to be better and better, Hashem is more 'there' to help them when they need Hashem's help when emergencies and troubles happen.

The last 30 years in America has witnessed a deterioration of moral standards.  As a result, it is possible that Hashem's presence is less than it could be.  As a result, we find less resistance in the air to do things that are wrong, and feel less of God's presence to inspire us to greater spiritual heights.  This is not a good situation.  It makes us less sensitive to sin and genuine holiness.  In addition, it widens the door to the kinds of evils that plague society in general and Jews in particular.  And if bad events do take place, Hashem is less 'here' to answer our pleas.

Therefore, we should redouble our efforts to be involved with actions that result in 'kiddush Hashem', that increase the presence of Hashem around us, so we can reverse the slippery slope's downward direction, and encourage and propel ourselves towards higher levels of holiness.